September 03, 2014 By Sean
September 03, 2014 By Guest Author
September 03, 2014 By Guest Author
September 02, 2014 By Sean
September 02, 2014 By Guest Author
Warranty Direct’s 2012 Most Reliable and Least Reliable Cars
Using its own statistics of frequency of problems and hard cash paid out for repairs. Warranty Direct has nominated the Most Reliable and Least Reliable cars built between 1990 and 2009.
In celebrating its 15th anniversary, Warranty Direct studied more than 200,000 live and historical policies spanning the decade and a half since it started recording reliability data with its unique Reliability Index in 1997, for cars dating back to 1990.
The Reliability Index should be only one of the factors considered when making a car purchase. Items such as residual value, safety, how much of your time it takes to get repaired, and such should also be considered.
When using the Reliability Index as the only criteria for making a car choice, remember that ‘Warranty Direct’ is really an insurance company and as such has profit motives as its primary goal and the policies they sell are not identical for everyone. When purchasing a policy you are presented with several preselected amounts and types of coverage, with ala carte additional coverages. Thus one persons coverage may be restrictive and those restrictions prevent them from filing a claim for a particular repair. Also the amount ‘Warranty Direct’ pays out influences the reliability rank, as an example from the press release;
The Mercedes SL, for instance, breaks down less often than almost every other car in the lowest-ranked group, but high repair costs places the car near the foot of the rankings.
Keep in mind also no two drivers take care of their cars the same. A car that is properly maintained and driven more conservatively will have lower repair costs than one that is abused. Another factor is the parts costs, as the parts to repair a Mercedes are higher than a Suzuki Alto, so should the relative parts cost (original car cost / repair part cost) should be a percentage rather than a £ cost as the later distorts the true cost of reliability.
Isn’t reliability simply reduced to the fact that when you start your car it starts and runs, not how much it costs to repair.
I would much rather have a Mercedes SL to drive than a Toyota Aygo. Which would you rather drive?
From the Press Release:
The Reliability Index has become an industry benchmark for used car reliability, using a complex formula to rank more than 450 individual models, taking into account factors such as how often the car breaks down, how much it costs to repair, plus average age and mileage.
Japanese and Far Eastern makes have dominated the Reliability Index’s annual study in recent years and, barring Vauxhall’s diminutive Agila, which is second in the list, they populate most of the ‘top 10 most reliable cars’ since 1997, with Suzuki’s Alto third and the Toyota Aygo fourth.
Toyota and Honda fare best in the top 10, with two entries apiece in the list, while the Supermini category for small cars dominates the most reliable vehicles on the road.
At the other end of the scale, larger, more sophisticated and luxury cars, such as the Bentley Continental GT, defy their bigger price tags by breaking down more often or costing more to repair.
The Porsche 911 (996) features in the 10 least reliable cars of the last 15 years despite the best annual incident rate of the group, at 39%, because of its hefty average repair cost of £847.52.
The same can be said for prestige brand, Mercedes, whose cars feature three times in the bottom 10 places on the list. The SL, for instance, breaks down less often than almost every other car in the lowest-ranked group, but high repair costs places the car near the foot of the rankings.
Warranty Direct managing director, Duncan McClure Fisher, said: “During our 15 years in business, we’ve racked up an enormously comprehensive database of cars and what makes them tick, or rather, what doesn’t. “Most people looking to buy a used car hold reliability close to the top of their requirements, so the information our Reliability Index now holds is a vital tool for any purchaser.
“Over the years, we’ve seen countless new technologies introduced to cars – they are now more complex than ever and, while many innovations are geared towards important considerations, like safety, it also means there is more and more that can go wrong.
“As an example, the first car we ever covered was an Audi 100 – that was replaced by the A6, which features start/stop technology, an electromechanical parking brake, a park assist system and sensors for tyre pressure, light and rain, to name but a few new gadgets.”